Graft selection for ACL reconstruction
IntraarticTiming of surgery
After recovery from the initial injury
Resolution of inflammation
Return of full motion
Postop stiffness
ular reconstruction
Technical issues
Graft selection
Graft Placement
Graft Tensioning
Graft Fixation
Graft selection
Autologous hamstring
Triple- or quadruple- stranded
Strength : semiT 75%, gracilis 49% of ACL
Concern
Tendon healing within the bone tunnel
Lack of rigid bony fixation
RCT
No significant difference in graft failure between BPTB and hamstring
Graft selection
Donor site morbidity
Potential weakness of knee flexion ?
No significat difference in hamstring torque at 2 years after surgery
Regeneration of tendons
Toshino et al. : significant weakness when flexion > 70’
Graft selection
Allografts
No donor site morbidity
Shorter surgery time
Smaller incisions
Greater availability
Risk of disease transmission
From currently available literature,
Graft source has minimal effect on the outcome
Good results of autograft in young, active patients
Graft placement
Femoral attachment site is more critical
Proximity to center of axis of knee motion
Too anterior
Capturing of the knee
Loss of flexion
Tibial tunnel site
Posterior portion of the ACL tibial insertion
Decrease graft impingement while extension
Limited notchplasty
Narrow intercondyar notch shown to contribute to ACL injury
Excessive notchplasty may move femoral attachment site
Graft placement
Vertical tunnel position
High in the intercondylar notch (12 o’clock position)
Stability in AP plane
But rotatory instability
10 or 2 0’clock position
More anatomic
Provide rotatory stability
Limitation of transtibial technique
Through low medial portal or two-incision technique